Discussion Board

Topic: Question Regarding Eternity

From: Simon Hayns
Location: Hamilton, New Zealand
Date: 02/26/2009

Hi Greg

I just finished re-reading Eternity, and I find one passage confusing. At the end of chapter forty six, when Lanier is having his first aneurysm, there's a line that reads: "No pain, just the sudden withdrawl of He had not thought himself so "Oh, God.""
Was that a misprint, or were you conveying the breakdown of rational thought?

My copy is a paperback first VGSF edition, printed 1989.

As always, write more books!

Simon :-)

Re: Question Regarding Eternity

From: Greg Bear
Date: 02/26/2009

Lanier's brain is breaking down.

Re: Question Regarding Eternity

From: Simon Hayns
Location: Hamilton, new Zealand
Date: 02/26/2009

Thanks for clearing that up.
I love the way you describe those sort of things - the scene in Moving Mars when the QL thinker aboard Phobos chooses a bad path, when Glaucous flips the chancer's heart in City, the Jart breaching Olmy's defences in Eternity - your work almost reads as fantasy sometimes, but with an underpinning of hard science, it all seems so plausible. Fantastic work :-)

Re: Question Regarding Eternity

From: patrick
Location:
Date: 02/26/2009

Hm. Maybe I forget...um, yeah....but it's curious two of the main characters have brain- (and memory-) related traumas.

Re: Question Regarding Eternity

From: Greg Bear
Date: 02/26/2009

Thanks, Simon.

Re: Question Regarding Eternity

From: Greg Bear
Date: 02/26/2009

As I approach the end of a novel, I entirely sympathize!

Respond to this discussion

May we post your correspondence on this site?
Yes
No
IMPORTANT: For form verification, type the following number in the box below: 75




See Also...

Archives: [Oct-Dec 2004] [Jan-June 2005] [July-Dec 2005] [Jan-June 2006] [July 2006] [Aug-Dec 2006] [2007] [2008] [2009] [Current] [Search Blog Archives]