Blog Archives: January-June, 2006

Archives: [Oct-Dec 2004] [Jan-June 2005] [July-Dec 2005] [Jan-June 2006] [July 2006] [Aug-Dec 2006] [2007] [2008] [Current] [Search Blog Archives]


PROGRAMMING A KILLER PROBE
Posted By: Randy Merkel, Paso Robles, CA - 06/29/2006 05:15:20 PM

I recently reread Forge of God and Anvil of Stars, in reverse order for some reason. This time I noticed some differences from the lead in to Anvil in the last chapter of Forge. I'd like to say I thought it was a good idea to drop artificial gravity. Artificial gravity is just so "Star Treky" ;)

One thing that intrigues me is the programming of the killer probes. You want them to look for possible civilizations, but not to accidentally come back home like boomerang. So you might want to program them to know where home is, but you don't want somebody to capture one and discover it's origin. That's quite a pickle for the probe designers. I can think of the following possibilities:

1. Don't program the origin in the probes and then be "very quiet" after you launch them. The problem is that the probes would eventually start coming back if they search the stars randomly.

2. Program the origin in the probes but add some sort of self destruct device if they get captured. This device would have to be pretty much perfect.

3. Program in the desired search direction or pattern that generally points away from the origin. Many probes would have to be captured in different systems to deduce the origin.

4. Add a secret communication channel that would disable any probes that found there way home. The trouble is somebody else might capture a probe and figure this out.

None of these seem very satisfactory, Any thoughts?

P.S. Anvil suggests that the benefactors ships are programmed in much the same way to protect them!

Response: Programming a Killer Probe
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/29/2006 07:19:34 PM

Very good thinking, and great questions, Randy! We'll just have to wait and see...

WHAT'S NEXT?
Posted By: Greg Kingsley, Broken Arrow, Oklahoma - 06/29/2006 05:07:27 PM

Have you ever considered working with Ben Bova on
anything? You and he are my favorites in Sci Fi.
Two such incredible minds would cause a SuperNova!

A video-taped dinner with you and he would be a
great interesting reality show!
(for one night, of course)
Can't put such great people together without some
explosive science and human interest.

Invent a "transmorgafier" (calvin and hobbs) and I
would volunteer to be the fly on the wall during
that dinner!

Thanks Greg, I am buying your new hardback.

Greg Kingsley
AMR AMT

Response: What's next?
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/29/2006 07:18:04 PM

That would be fun. Ben was very important to my career back in the seventies--he was responsible for buying the two stories that got me my two ANALOG covers, "A Martian Ricorso" and "The Wind from a Burning Woman."

BIOLOGY SCIENCE FICTION
Posted By: Kingsley Yin, Burlington, NJ - 06/28/2006 08:44:07 AM

Dear Greg,

There have been so many emails concerning the "Darwin" books. All have been most interesting. I am curious about one thing. Although there are many well published SciFiction authors, there appear at least to my meagre knowledge, few who write in the Biological field/theme. Yourself and Stephen Baxter are two, but I cannot seem to think of others.The overwhelming majority write stories in the general world of Physics. I realize these are VERY general classifications, but to me they are helpful. This is because when I pick up any SciFi book, I would like to know the general field/theme of it. I have read all your books which have a strong Biology theme and they sit in their place of honor in my library. I would however like to add some others (apart from Baxter), but appear quite lost.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/28/2006 10:43:01 AM

Recently, Nancy Kress, Gwyneth Jones, Mary Rosenblum, Kathleen Ann Goonan, Joan Slonczewski, and a number of others have tackled substantial biological themes in their novels. But you're correct, Kingsley--a number of readers have classified my near-future biotech novels as "thrillers" and not SF, whereas an astronomy or physics-oriented story would have more easily slipped by. An interesting divide in the scientific culture!

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: patrick - 06/28/2006 12:36:17 PM

Greg Egan is a hardcore bio dude, having degrees in such, and speculating very intensely into new states of being from sometimes simple embarkations.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/28/2006 01:52:38 PM

Take a look at TERANESIA by Greg Egan, as well as DARWINIA by Robert Charles Wilson. Some years ago, I edited NEW LEGENDS and purchased Greg's fine story "Wang's Carpets." And a brother novel to BLOOD MUSIC (both were published in 1985) is Paul Preuss's HUMAN ERROR.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: patrick - 06/28/2006 04:01:16 PM

....actually, in my mind, I'd confused Egan's story with Paul J. McAuley's, 'When Strangers Meet', which is also in that anthology, and I thought of both of them at the time, but couldn't recall McAuley.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/28/2006 04:09:07 PM

Paul McAuley also has biological training, and his work should be added to this list! Any more? Thanks, patrick.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Terran, Florida - 06/29/2006 02:07:05 PM

Frank Herbert used evolution and biological disaster in quite a lot of his books, often with a sociological perspective. That is, what would people do in the face of this biological or environmental crisis? "The White Plague" dealt with a man-made virus that killed off most of the women on the planet, "Hellstrom's Hive" featured controlled evolution of humans (breeding, I suppose), and "The Jesus Incident" and its sequels "The Lazarus Effect" and "The Ascension Factor" dealt with humans coping with alien biology as well as a highly evolved spaceship with a God complex.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/29/2006 02:22:25 PM

Science Fiction Museum recently inducted Frank Herbert into its Hall of Fame. Frank also pioneered ecological themes in science fiction with--of course!--DUNE. I remember reading the Ace paperback of DUNE on a schoolbus in 1967 and having one of my fellow students--a comely female who, to my knowledge, never read sf--saying she had been hearing a lot about this terrific novel... The buzz was pretty hot about Frank's achievement even then!

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Paul Shen-Brown, Arcadia, CA - 07/17/2006 03:01:54 PM

James Alan Gardner's book "Hunted" has a good take on the power of pheromones, though in his story it is an alien race modeled loosely after bees. It makes good food for thought, and is very, very funny.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Keith Leyland, St. Helens, UK - 07/26/2006 03:47:57 PM

I've been reading science fiction since I was 11 which was soooooooo long ago and I don't remember too many biology-themed books in the genre. However, Kingsley, if memory serves there are a couple by a guy named Charles Eric Maine. The titles escape me but they are certainly medical in nature. Worth a look maybe? Regards.

Response: Biology Science Fiction
Posted By: Greg Bear - 07/26/2006 04:29:12 PM

James White's Hospital Stationseries certainly qualifes in the medical category, as well. Thanks, Keith!

BACKGROUND SCIENCE IN DARWIN'S RADIO
Posted By: Ruth W. Block, Santa Monica, CA - 06/26/2006 03:06:01 PM

By chance I have read Darwin's Radio, so wonderful a book! For at least half of the book I found myself struggling to understand the "science"...looking up concepts, etc., while enjoying the scientists and academia I so well know. Aha! Here comes Sheva and what she can do and I'm astonished that I am reading "science fiction" which I do NOT customarily read because I want to experience books. Sure, my life is nothing like "Brothers Karamazov" but I recognize it in endless depths in me, the reader, because it is grounded, it is connected to me and to you. Darwin's Radio really makes it but now I am frustrated because I do not know where the science we now know ends and Sheva's genome begins.

And while Im on the subject...some of the Fantasy I've dipped into (gifts)should have denials on every page...most of the kids who read that stuff think it is actually history, truth.


Response: Background Science in Darwin's Radio
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/26/2006 03:44:08 PM

Thanks, Ruth! We do indeed need perspective on the difference between fact and fiction. What science fiction has always done for me is take me beyond that last limitation--the limits of my own existence, or any conceivable human experience. Sure, it's not entirely real--but it stimulates parts of the brain most other forms of fiction can't reach. If you haven't already, you should definitely try the essays and short stories of Jorge Luis Borges for more mind-bending excursions on the borders of fact and fiction. And then try my novel MOVING MARS, which is, after all, only the tell-all autobiography of a young woman...born on Mars, a century and a half from now. (And by the way, an infectious endogenous retrovirus, like Sheva in some respects, has been found in wasps. They express it to infect and subdue caterpillars. A weapon in their own DNA! This was not known when I wrote DARWIN'S RADIO.)

Response: Background Science in Darwin's Radio
Posted By: Terran, Florida - 06/27/2006 05:41:14 AM

I don't think science fiction or fantasy is any different than any other form of narrative literature - in order to understand ourselves (individually, and as a people), we must step outside ourselves. Good science fiction and fantasy simply explores what we might do in extraordinary situations, which is the same thing that nearly all entertaining, intriguing, and thought-provoking literature does.

THE STRANGE LITTLE MIND OF CORDWAINER SMITH
Posted By: Thomas P. Doyle, Tucson, AZ - 06/23/2006 04:43:32 PM

Dear Greg:
I just saw on your site that you have written a sequel
to "Darwins Radio" (one of my favorites). Excelsior! Your take on evolution is every bit as interesting as Sturgeons "More Than Human" and that Arthur C. Clarke work (whose title escapes me) where demonic looking
aliens are sent to shepard humanity's quantum leap to becoming a new organism. I would tell you to keep up the good work, but as always, you will. But the real purpose of my letter is to discuss an author with you. Many authors are easy to categorize: Geniuses with prolific output such as your dear departed farther-in-law (god rest his soul),
authors whose madness translates to brilliance such as Philip K. Dick, side splitting humorists such as Vonnegut and John Sladek, great hard science fiction writers that use technology and still are able to competently convey a story such as Vernor Vinge, Frank Herbert, Hal Clement and
yourself, Authors that combine humor with hard SF such as John Varley and Dark visions dealing with the possible such as Lucius Shepard (who I consider a modern-day combination of Kafka and Konrad). But the one author that I consider totally and completely uncopiable is the strange little mind of Cordwainer Smith.
Now don't get me wrong, Dr. Paul Myron Anthony Linebarger had nothing close to a small mind. His combination of education and experience alone made him one of the greatest intellectuals attracted to the field. It is almost incoceivable that a man who was a linguist and asiatic studies expert could create the bizarre, humorous, and absolutely believable universe that he did (Gardner Dozois thinks that his vision may be timeless). There is no "Space Opera", no true hard science fiction, and none of the standard sci-fi devices that are commonly found among other writers in the field. And not only is his vision unique, his prose style is absolutely uncopiable. It is a shame that like Dick, Herbert and Cornbluth he passed away at a much too young an age. Who knows what classics he would have written given more time. I raise my glass to him and to his wonderful stories.
What is your opinion of this author?

Your loyal fan,

"Big Tom" Doyle

PS: Maybe I will take your advice on my earlier message. What source would you recommend for generating a proper manuscript (ie...Strunk and Whites)?

Response: The Strange Little Mind of Cordwainer Smith
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/23/2006 04:54:24 PM

Thanks, Thomas! I love Cordwainer Smith--he's one of our masters, and every bit as wonderfully unclassifiable as, say, Dick or Bradbury or Sturgeon. The Sir Arthur Clarke novel is of course CHILDHOOD'S END.

Manuscript form is generally explained in in the Writer's Digest books on writing--but simply, a book manuscript should be typed or printed double-space in a legible font (Courier or Times Roman might be best) on 8 1/2 by 11 white paper, with around an inch of margin on each side. Ragged right (no justification) and no fancy typography! (Things were so much simpler with typewriters...)

GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE
Posted By: Ryan Costa, Memphis, TN - 06/22/2006 10:00:25 PM

Hello,

I remember some future socio-economic conditions briefly alluded to in Darwin's Children. Would you write a speculative near-future book built around consequences of global climate change? Something James Kunstler lite would be pretty entertaining.

Response: Global Climate change
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/23/2006 10:17:34 AM

Actually, Kim Stanley Robinson is doing a fine job of this in his novels, FORTY SIGNS OF RAIN and FIFTY DEGREES BELOW. Check them out! (DARWIN'S RADIO begins with glacial melting in the Alps...)

FANTASY?
Posted By: James A McVean, Scotland - 06/21/2006 02:09:18 PM

Greg,

I have read and Loved The Omnibus book - SONGS OF EARTH AND POWER.

I have also read a couple of your Sci-Fi novels...

Do you have any thoughts or intentions to write any more pure fantasy??

May the gods of inspiration keep the dark stuff flowing from your quill...

Cheers

James A McVean

Response: Fantasy?
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/21/2006 02:20:46 PM

No pure fantasy in the works for now--but the urge still lingers! CITY AT THE END OF TIME will pick up on some of the ideas and themes in SONGS OF EARTH AND POWER, however...

A QUESTION ABOUT DARWIN'S CHILDREN
Posted By: Eckhard Freuwoert, Germany - 06/20/2006 02:21:16 AM

Dear Greg Bear,
I've read two of your books, 'Darwin´s Radio' and 'Darwin´s Children'. They are fantastic! And I had two times trouble with my wife because I could not put away these books... But I have questions about 'Darwin´s Children'. You described the feelings and the communication of the SHEVA children in a very realistic way which is considerable similar to the feelings and communication of synaesthetes like I described it in my own fantasy novel 'Norgast' (which was published in Germany this year). At another place in your book you mentioned Vilayanur S. Ramachandran who is a leading scientist in real existing synaesthesia (others are Richard E. Cytowic or Peter Grossenbacher, who calls synaesthesia the next step in evolution). For that reason: Where there any connections between synaesthesia and the SHEVA children when you wrote 'Darwin´s Children'? Did you take the real existing communication between synaesthetes as a model?
Regards and greetings from Germany
Eckhard Freuwört

Response: A question about Darwin's Children
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/20/2006 10:10:58 AM

Hello, Eckhard! As I recall, Kaye Lang studies a number of texts with reference to her own experience of epiphany, which may have synaesthetic components. The Shevites themselves are much more consciously smell-sensitive, and develop language that reflects this ability, but I don't otherwise see much connection with synaesthesia, a fascinating condition in its own right. Is NORGAST available in English?

Response: AW: A question about Darwin's Children
Posted By: Eckhard Freuwoert, Germany - 06/21/2006 09:20:05 AM

Hi Greg,
Norgast is only available in German language - sorry! You wrote 'The Shevites themselves are much more consciously smell-sensitive, and develop language that reflects this ability'. In a sense it's the same with some synaesthetes who are trying to find their own words (or should I say their own language?) for the perception of synaesthesia. The synaesthetes are not smell-sensitive but sometimes they are using a special kind of minimum message communication. That was the reason for my question. As I read 'Darwin´s Children', I thought of some parallels between the Shevites and the synaesthetes. Thanks for your answer!
Best regards
Eckhard.

IMAGINING THE TENTH DIMENSION
Posted By: Rob Bryanton - 06/19/2006 10:20:34 PM

Hi Greg, several months ago I told you I was working on a book called "Imagining the Tenth Dimension: a new way of thinking about time, space and string theory", some parts of which have connections to ideas you have exposed me to over the last twenty years. At www.tenthdimension.com you will find an eleven minute animation which explores the basic concepts from chapter one of the book, and there is also a forum where people can discuss and debate the ideas presented on the website and in the book. I hope you enjoy the site.

Thanks for being such an inspiration to me!

Rob Bryanton
www.tenthdimension.com

Response: Imagining the Tenth Dimension
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/20/2006 10:03:27 AM

Thanks, Rob! Here's to getting feedback from more readers!

TRANSFORMATION
Posted By: Lisa, Colorado - 06/16/2006 02:25:48 PM

Hi Greg,

I just finished "Darwin's Radio" and have a question for you. What was the purpose of the Neandertal's facial mask? Why would they need to change anything about their facial features to bring one of us into the world? We are dapple deprived! Loved the book and can't wait to read "Darwin's Children."

Take Care!
Lisa

Response: Transformation
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/16/2006 05:32:39 PM

Hello, Lisa! Facial masks and other changes help the infant imprint on its parents and give the parents a (temporary) ability to adapt to the new type of offspring. Speculative, of course--but how would YOU like to discover so early that your parents were so primitive? Thanks for your kind words!

OF SNAKES AND THINGS
Posted By: Alex Morse, Texas - 06/14/2006 11:15:11 AM

I've noticed a lot of recurring themes and imagery in your books. I'm impressed that you can take some of the same basic ideas and give them a new feel or aspect in different stories. I never feel like I'm reading a rehash of an earlier story despite there being many similarities in the details. I have a couple questions on the concepts I see recurring most often.

1) bell continuum/descriptor theory/noach

I swear I've actually heard similar theories before but I can't find anything lately. Are these concepts mostly original to you, or were you influenced by other theories? If the latter, where can I find more information about them?

2) Snakes/serpents/worms

I've seen snake like beings appear in several places. The "clean up crew" in Dead Lines, the cooperating race in Anvil of Stars, one of the alternate reality races in your Scattershot short story. I'm unclear if you have a fondness for snakes, or an aversion to them. Are you using the imagery to play on some of our more primal fears, or is your use something more personal?

Please never stop writing. I've enjoyed every story of yours that I've read and look forward to many more.

Response: Of Snakes and things
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/14/2006 12:39:51 PM

Hello, Alex! Descriptor theory is not unique to me--a computational view of physics has been attempted before, from Frederick Kantor's INFORMATION MECHANICS in the sixties to John Archibald Wheeler's "Its from Bits" ideas more recently. I don't know whether there's a good bibliography of works and citations on the Web, but these names would be a good place to begin your search. Most recently, Stephen Wolfram's A NEW KIND OF SCIENCE tackles all sorts of fascinating and controversial issues.

I did indeed expand the snakes from "Scattershot" into the Brothers in ANVIL OF STARS. The "clean up crew" (good phrase, that!) in DEAD LINES are eels, not snakes. Big difference?

Story-wise, I've noted similar deep structures in some of my work. Most strikingly, "Scattershot" and "Hardfought" have pretty similar deep structure. But analyzing a work at this level can induce puzzlement in some readers. I got in some trouble in the 1970s for breaking ALIEN down to its psychological basics as a feminist nightmare! With "Mother" allowing into the house a highly phallic "bad boyfriend" (at the behest of her "favorite son," Ash) who proceeds to rape and kill and impregnate all the remaining children, both male and female... Deep structure, indeed!

Thanks for the kind words and deep thought, Alex.

Response: Of Snakes and things
Posted By: patrick - 06/16/2006 08:50:14 PM

Alien a feminist nightmare! Hahahaha, you're the man!!

Response: Of Snakes and things
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/18/2006 06:39:04 PM

Not the phrase I would have used under the circumstances, Patrick!

SCHMOOZING WITH OTHER WRITERS....
Posted By: patrick - 06/10/2006 12:59:45 AM

What has it been like interacting with various other authors, particularly in light of personal differences (such as with Pournelle)?

Response: Schmoozing with other writers....
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/12/2006 10:16:38 AM

Hanging out with writers and other creative folks is usually a delight, *especially* when there are disagreements. (No physical altercations, so far.) Jerry has always been stimulating, even when we (almost) violently disagree--and on a number of occasions, his insights have been crucial. He's got a terrific political instinct which I have been known to tap into both for character studies and for structure and dynamics in my social systems. What I've learned over the years is to listen closely to people who disagree with me--because re-assessment is crucial to mental health. When the listening stops, and beliefs get set in concrete, little bits of the brain start dying.

Response: Schmoozing with other writers....
Posted By: patrick - 06/12/2006 12:08:09 PM

Yeah, I agree. For example, I frequent Dan Simmons forum, and someone started a thread on 'common books' (for those of you who don't know - and I didn't, before this - it's like a type of clip book for writers to put down little tidbits of whatever they encounter, to refer to later), and another person posted a link to a blog (http://misssnark.blogspot.com/2006/06/when-are-you-going-to-write-real-book.html) that had on it a posting about comebacks to someone who asks 'when are you going to write a real book?'

Coming from the agreed point of view of listening, I said - both in address to the forum post, and at the blog: This is egotism. The emotionally intelligent person would think for a second, then ask the question, "What do you mean by real?"...and proceed to learn something.

In the blog, surprise, it didn't get posted.

Also, I just want to mention that it's immensely fascinating to be able to interact with people like you and Dan (in your blog and his forum). Both of you are starting to get, or getting (and Dan, in his monthly messages is really creating some circumstances), some controversial addresses from readers and such, bringing out some things in you we might otherwise never know of.

THE FORGE OF GOD
Posted By: Armand Gagnon, Springfield, Oregon - 06/07/2006 08:43:27 PM

Hello Greg Bear,
I just finished THE FORGE OF GOD and I was amazed at the surprise ending. So often in novels, sci-fi or otherwise, the "bads guys" never win. Your originality and scope is very uplifting and this alien invasion novel belongs in a unique class all unto itself. The mecanical robotic chromium spiders and scouring out of the Earth's crust and mantel's interior are sheer joy to behold! Though it was written in 1986, much of the religious overtones of fanaticism based on fear (as was delineated in U. S President Crockerman) seem to be quite a propos in today's times. Thank you for such a frightening as well as enlightening work of literary genius. I am off to read more of your books. Thank you so much.
Sincerely, Armand Gagnon

Response: The Forge of God
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/08/2006 09:47:09 AM

Thanks for the kind words, Armand!

HELLO FROM FIRST-TIMER
Posted By: Cpt John H. Smith III, Baghdad, Iraq - 06/04/2006 02:37:26 AM

Dear Mr. Bear,

I an intelligence officer in the US Army, currently deployed on my second tour in Iraq. I read a lot while I'm here, because when I have down time on the road, a book is my best friend. We have a sort of library at our camp where people exchange books. I noticed a copy of "Darwin's Radio" and decided to give it a try. While I have read a great deal of science fiction, I have to admit I had never heard of you before. But the book caught my interest because I also happen to have a great passion for anthropology. The book was absolutely wonderful and totally original. Probably the first real thriller based on anthropology and starring an anthropologist as the lead man - a rare thing indeed (stories about whip-wielding archeologists don't count). You bring up some concepts that are not mainstream, like homo sapiens evolving from Neanderthals, but I have no problem with that, because if punctuated equilibria did occur the way you describe it in the book, all old assumptions would have to be reevaluated anyway.
I particularly liked the part when Kaye Lang was about to give birth, and Dr. Galbreath told her no anesthesia, no eyedrops for the baby's eyes, etc, saying "it's a whole new ball game". The idea of discovering a new human in our midst, and having to learn everything about them from scratch, would be like an anthro's dream come true.

I liked the book so much that I ordered the sequel through Amazon.com right away. But while "Darwin's Children" was a great novel as well, there were some problems for me. My feelings were so mixed that I felt I had to write you. Simply put, it was way too political. The book was written during an election year and it shows. The few obvious barbs in the first book turned into full-blown partisan rancor in second book (something we already get too much of in the media as it is). It's pretty obvious you are very angry with the Bush administration, the Patriot Act, and Fox News. When someone else on this site mentioned your Republican-bashing, you claimed these were only opinions expressed by the characters in the book. But its far more than that. For example, you outright say that the Republicans were the ones who gutted the medical supplies in the Sheva clinics (therefore leaving 75,000 children to die). In fact, every single Republican, religious conservative, military member, or Fox News person are portrayed in your book as bloodthirsty, greedy, bigoted, idiotic, or all of the above. On the other hand, ethnic minorities and Democrats are consistently portrayed as good guys (at least you weren't sexist; your men and woman characters were pretty evenly split between hero/villian). I'm not going to tell you how to write a book, because you obviously know how, and you do it very well. And I realize you can't please everybody, and it makes a pretty contrived story if you have to count your villians and heroes and make sure they are equally represented all around. But just FYI, a story does lose some credibility if it reads so slanted it feels like it was offically edited and approved by one political party's national committee. And it also risks alienating many people who might otherwise want to read your works. Even though I was dying to see how the story turns out, there were a few times I almost stopped reading the book in frustration at some of these cheap-shots. The line where the Fox News official says "science makes my head hurt". C'mon... didn't you think that ridicule was just a little childish and over the top?

Just to let you know, I'm in the military, a Christian, usually vote Republican, and often watch Fox News. But I love science, hate bigotry, and I would never support taking children away from their parents as described in the book on pure speculation that they might be infectious (and certainly not for 15 years!). And even if I was ordered to, I also would never shoot at helicopters that are simply delivering needed medical supplies (like the national guard does in your book), or shoot at children who are not threatening anyone. Nor would any of the other Republicans or miltary buddies of mine that I know. I also can't help pointing out that it was actually a Democratic administration that produced the closest US historical parallel to the events in your book, namely the internment of the Japanese during WWII.

And on another topic, the other problem with the book is a sin of omission, not commission. "Darwin's Children" left so many things questions unanswered that it begs for a sequel. What kind of baby did Helen Fremont eventually have? If Ms Cross is such a nice person, why was her company harvesting Sheva children's organs and bones? If the "Shevites" are technically not human, wouldn't the law have to be rewritten to include their citizenship and "human" rights? What are the ramifications for the future, when Shevites grow up and become and integral part of society, even entering politics themselves? What about Shevite vs. Human violence, even wars? Finally, since I'm assuming they wouldn't ALL be nice people, I'd be very interested to know what kind of villians or criminals would a Shevite society produce? That could be frightening.

Anyway, in spite of the above thank you for such a great read. I plan to try some of your other works.

Response: Hello from first-timer
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/04/2006 06:54:12 PM

Thanks, John! Your letter is so good, it's going to get a long response--perhaps too long! I know you have better things to do over there. Apologies in advance.

First, in my defense, I have to point out that a number of conservatives fare pretty well in DARWIN'S CHILDREN. The two Virginia law enforcement officers in the first few chapters seem sympathetic to Shevite families, and opposed to the thuggish ways of certain government agencies. Those gentleman are doubtless conservatives, and probably Christians. Many Christian conservatives head for the hills to protect their Shevite children, and Mormons actively resist as well--a point that was noted with somewhat puzzled approval in Utah when I was touring to promote my novel. ("How could you know we'd act that way?")

Scientists in both novels cross the line back and forth between being good and bad, blowing with the winds of inadequae information--just like the politicians. So--let's be fair, John.

DARWIN'S CHILDREN was essentially plotted by 1997-98. The parallels between what I described while writing it during 2000-2002 are pretty chilling today--the book, I think, remains convincing and up-to-date.

But I'm far from being a knee-jerk Democrat. I call myself a liberal because they're pretty rare these days, but I appear actually to be a rugged individualist in the mold of the young Philip Wylie. I believe in the separation of church and state, a woman's right to choose, the constitutional protection of an individual's rights against the majority's knee-jerk response to threats real or perceived, and many other old-fashioned but highly threatened ideas.

If I have any bias, it's against entrenched aristocracies--the combination of money, power, and privilege with politics. I am very much against self-styled elitists of any stripe, and my novels have reflected that often--compare QUEEN OF ANGELS, SLANT, and MOVING MARS. (In THE FORGE OF GOD, the overwhelmed, dysfunctional president is a Democrat.)

Recently, a fellow author described me as a Libertarian conservative in the mold of Jerry Pournelle! Jerry is a good friend, who's put me in the way of many marvelous opportunities--but we disagree on many issues.

So how can I be both a knee-jerk Democrat and a libertarian conservative? In truth, I'm neither.

I actually write my novels from a biological and anthropological perspective, and that's why Republicans come off rather poorly in DARWIN'S CHILDREN. Since before the 1930s, the Republican party has positioned itself as America's immune response, if you will--working against anything radically new or from the outside, including Jews, immigrants, and civil rights. Republicans led the charge against Communism--which resulted not only in Joe McCarthy, but also the eventual elimination of that particularly nasty strain in American politics and culture, and the crumbling demise of the Soviet Union--not bad things overall--but with a lot of collateral damage to our nation, real harm, like a poorly targeted immune response! Inflammation and tissue damage, if you will. Anybody in an ER will tell you how dangerous the immune system can be--it can kill you, if it isn't properly balanced and controlled.

Which party could most aptly be described, today, as the party of hate and suspicion? Ask gays, lesbians, Mexicans, Muslims...or liberals!... which party they feel most threatened by.

Mary Cheney, a good Republican, is out fighting for her rights even now, standing up against her President, who still throws red meat to his super-conservative base.

And yet, without an immune system, this nation would no longer exist.

Despite all this--Bush is probably one of the least racist Republicans we've seen in generations. History is full of contradictions.

Which is why my novel cannot be read simply.

As for Fox News, I've heard a lot worse commentary while actually listening to that channel. Even now, THE DAILY SHOW and THE COLBERT report regularly post snippets of over-the-top nonsense from Fox News, and it used to be LOTS worse. To be fair, I'd probably now add CNN's Lou Dobbs--with his incessant, single-issue demagoguery, he's almost as bad.

The threat, however, is much more serious in my novel...Remember, the Shevites are considered by many experts to be perfectly capable of harboring and expressing deadly viruses. How would YOU respond to having a Shevite go to school with one of your own children?

Imagine what we might do if Muslims or Mexican illegals were found to be harboring killer bird flu.

How did people respond initially to children with HIV?

Are there no parallels in America's history--even before the War on Terror--to the "schools" established for the Virus Children? FDR was president when we locked up our Japanese in desert camps. No one is immune to fear.

Toward the conclusion of DARWIN'S CHILDREN, the President and his party finally start to come around, reacting to reports of tremendous atrocities. There is a painful sense of reconciliation in the air.

Balance and reconciliation, after trauma, is how we heal.

There likely will not be a third volume. Too many angry readers have spread the word about DARWIN'S CHILDREN, substantially damaging sales. I must have hit a nerve--total nonsense would not have aroused so much indignation.

However, if I were to write that third volume, your suppositions about the Shevites would be correct--they're human, far from perfect, and capable of evil and violence, just like the rest of us. They'd also become thoroughly political--probably better politicans than any we have today! And Stella Nova would indeed go to Washington DC.

If it's any comfort, John, my novel QUANTICO is dominated by FBI agents, Secret Service agents, soldiers, etc... And their words tend not to be in favor of liberals. Will any Bush-Libertarians and Republicans start taking me to task for these somewhat insulting descriptions, put in the mouths of my characters? I doubt it. There are very few Bush-Libertarians left, actually.

QUANTICO is dedicated to those who put themselves in harm's way, whatever the national policy. That means it's dedicated to you and those around you. I tend to believe that you're doing a hell of a job, under very difficult conditions, and you've all earned the right to chew me out any which way you wish. But please make sure you understand what I'm actually trying to say.

Keep in touch, John, and let us know about your experiences! Your opinions and your service are deeply valued.




Response: Hello from first-timer
Posted By: Cpt John H. Smith III, Baghdad, Iraq - 06/07/2006 10:54:22 AM

Mr. Bear,

Thank you for answering so quickly. The longer, the better, in my opinion. I am busy here yes, but ironically without the demands of family, I probably have more free time here than I do at home. Besides, I am a liasion officer with a Iraqi police battalion, and work along their schedule. They need a lot of babysitting but they are not exactly around the clock workaholics...

I have to disagree that conservatives are fare well at all in the novel. Yes, certain local law enforcement make heroic stands against the feds, but its not made clear what their ideology is. Heck, I've seen local sheriff deputies who looked like they just stepped out of a hippie commune. The President and his party at the end of the second book eventually come around, but unless I missed something, you don't say what party he belongs to. He can't be the same President from DARWIN'S RADIO because it takes place about 15-18 years later.

I also noticed you didn't include mention of protests from left leaning groups other than rather quiet disagreement with the government. But history has shown that if there is one thing the left is, its not subtle or quiet in their protesting! Moreover, they wouldn't all agree that the Shiva children are wonderful either; for example, just like the AIDS epidemic and 9/11, I am certain there would be a significant amount of conspiracy theorists that would believe that the US govt or the CIA secretly created the SHEVA virus for their own nefarious purposes.

I concede that the Republicans would be described by most, (if they have to choose), as the party of "hate and suspicion", but these preconceptions are too often formed by the most extreme elements in that party, not by most of its members. They certainly don't always reflect reality. For the same reasons, I'm sure the Democrats would be described as the party of "weak on defense and anti-military", even though nearly all of the major wars in our history were started under Democratic presidents.

Moreover, its important to keep in mind: hatred of what? Suspicion of what? For example, most Republicans would claim that hatred of those who seek to destroy us, and suspicion of those who took advantage for so long of our lax immigration enforcement, is a healthy thing.

Fox News is no more right-leaning than the other major networks lean left. Part of the proof of this is their popularity; they were sucessful because they took advantage of a particular demographic that the other majors were ignoring. And yes, you bet I've heard all sorts of nonsense said on Fox News, but for each of these I can find an equal or worse one in the rest of the mainstream media. From Iraq, I see this all the time on how the war is reported (Look at the coverage right now on the Haditha killings; the press and editorials are literally flaying the military alive on the incident, before the investigations are even complete. In fact, no one has even been charged yet!) So the question is, why only mention Fox News in your book? It sure felt as if you had a real ax to grind against them. Or are you predicting that in the future there will be no other major networks around?

I'm sorry that your novel was smeared, but to be honest, I can see how a casual reader would think that certain parts were written to outright insult certain groups, and in the Michael Moore style of no-holds-barred politics today, one camp never forgives you if they think you are too firmly in the other camp...

I belong to a sizable web-based anthropology group, and am well-known to all the regular members. I'm going to recommend your book to them, and see what happens. It may attract a lot of notice just because its probably the first time a fiction book has been recommended to the group. I'm sure if they haven't read it already, they will love it. As a somewhat conservative guy, I am kind of a rare bird among anthros; most anthropology professors and students are to the far, far left of Karl Marx!

I already got the copy of "Forge of God" that I ordered, I can't wait to read it.

PS: Another idea, if you ever do a third book in the series - with demes, scent messages and cheek flashing, I'm curious, what the heck would porn for Shevites look like??
Hmmm, maybe forget I mentioned that...

Response: Hello from first-timer
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/07/2006 12:38:58 PM

Alas, extreme elements in any social group are usually the ones who initiate and often direct the discourse. For every idea there is an opposition idea, which is how society and politics works--no matter how sane the idea, a substantial group will oppose it, and that's actually quite healthy--sometimes even "sane" ideas turn out to be ill-conceived. When I go to the media for news, I try to catch many different reports on different networks and compare them with newspapers and magazines. Reading between the lines is a difficult art, but a necessary one--and jumping to conclusions, particularly with something as serious as the Haditha killings, is indeed dangerous.

But we all do it. It can take years for the whole truth to come out. In the meantime, we're all ignorant, angry, and frustrated.

Those of us who have tended in recent decades to vote Democrat or independent have noted for some time that spokespeople and many politicians on the right can dish out the vile epithets and the insults and the simplifications, but they can't take it. Think John McCain's little black baby in Georgia--a phone tree atrocity dreamed up by Bush operatives against a true conservative and war hero. Think Swift Boat. Think Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson. Think the scotched attempt to attack John Murtha. How many vilifications of "liberals" and Democrats--from Rove, O'Reilly or Limbaugh, or, God forbid, Coulter--can we accept before someone fires back?

In truth, the pundits and broadcasters and opinion shapers on the right behave like bullies with a slightly guilty conscience--but that bite of conscience only makes them more vicious. These guys aren't even populists in the mold of the racist Father Coughlin or Joe Pine--they're just by and large corrupt hypocrites with no real philosophy other than self-aggrandizement. They drag down honorable conservatism more with every day of their blather. They're verbal thugs.

They are, however, more interesting to listen to than Al Franken. Sigh.

But none of them can hold a candle to Jon Stewart and Stephen Colbert--who may single-handedly be winning this culture war through laughter. As far as I know, far-right motor-mouths do indignation and outrage beautifully--but they have absolutely no sense of humor. Comedy eludes them. So thank god for DAILY SHOW and COLBERT REPORT. (And strangely, these shows analyse many news stories with a biting wit and insight that seems sorely lacking on mainstream news shows. DAILY SHOW was the first to go back and check Bush's introduction to his first CIA director, Porter Goss--finding it to be word for word the same as his introduction to Michael Hayden. Wow.)

DARWIN'S RADIO and DARWIN'S CHILDREN are not so much diatribes as accurate descriptions of how Washington works in a crisis--and they have been lauded as such by scientists and insiders who know the process. Before publication, I fact-checked these books by running them past experts with major experience in epidemiology and the politics of science--and in 2000, 2001, and 2002, attended government funded conferences in Washington DC and elsewhere that raised the few hairs left on my head. I wove what I heard about science and politics into DARWIN'S CHILDREN--facts and observations that came from serious bipartisan groups.

John, smart and reasonable as you are, you're still not going back to look at my book--so I'll reprint that most controversial chapter. Questions from the teacher (supply answers with actual quotes from the text!): What party does the President, who eventually comes around, belong to? What groups does the Democratic congressman reach out to in his effort to roll back government intrusions into our private lives?

Here's the entire controversial chapter. Scientists, bureaucrats, Democrats, the New York Times, Republicans, nearly everybody takes their licks. So far, only staunch Republicans have complained about this chapter. Interesting, hm?

Here it is:


?We?ve been over and over this,? Dick Gianelli told Mitch, dropping a stack of scientific reprints on the coffee table between them. The news was not good.
Gianelli was short and round and his usually pale face was now a dangerous red. ?We?ve been reading everything you sent us ever since the congressman was elected. But they have twice as many experts, and they send twice as many papers. We?re drowning in papers, Mitch! And the language.? He thumped the stack. ?Can?t your people, all the biologists, just write to be understood? Don?t they realize how important it is to get the word out to everybody??
Mitch let his hands drop by his sides. ?They?re not my people, Dick. My people are archaeologists. They tend to write sparkling prose.?
Gianelli laughed, stood up from the couch and shook out his arms, then tipped a finger under his tight collar, as if letting out steam. His office was part of the suite assigned to Representative Dale Wickham, D., Virginia, whom he had faithfully served as director of public science for two of the toughest terms in U.S. history. The door to Wickham?s office was closed. He was on the Hill today.
?The congressman has made his views clear for years now. Your colleagues, scientists all, have hopped on the gravy train. They?ve joined up with NIH and CDC and Emergency Action, and they pay their visits mostly across the aisle. Wilson at FEMA and Doyle at DOJ have undercut us every step of the way, squirming like puppies to get their funding treats. Opposing them is like standing outside in a hail of cannonballs.?
?So what can I take home with me?? Mitch asked. ?To cheer up the missus. Any good news??
Gianelli shrugged. Mitch liked Gianelli but doubted he would live to see fifty. Gianelli had all the markers: pear shape, excessive girth, ghostly skin, thinning black hair, creased earlobes. He knew it, too. He worked hard and cared too much and swallowed his disappointments. A good man in a bad time. ?We got caught in a medical bear trap,? he said. ?We?ve never been prepared. Our best model for an epidemic was military response. So now we?ve had ten years of Emergency Action. We?ve practically signed away our country to Beltway bureaucrats with military and law enforcement training. Mark Augustine?s crew, Mitch. We?ve given them almost absolute authority.?
?I don?t think I?m capable of understanding how those people think,? Mitch said.
?I thought I did, once,? Gianelli said. ?We tried to build a coalition. The congressman roped in Christian groups, the NRA, conspiracy nuts, flag burners and flag lovers, anybody who?s ever expressed a shred of suspicion about the guv?ment. We?ve gone hat in hand to every decent judge, every civil libertarian still above ground, literally and figuratively. We?ve been checked every step of the way. It was made very clear to the congressman that if he threw up any more dust, he, personally, all on his lonesome, could force the president to declare martial law.?
?What?s the difference, Dick?? Mitch asked. ?They?ve suspended habeas corpus.?
?For a special class, Mitch.?
?My daughter,? Mitch growled.
Gianelli nodded. ?Civil courts still operate, though under special guidelines. Nothing much has changed for the frightened average citizen, who?s kind of fuzzy about civil rights anyway. When Mark Augustine put together Emergency Action, he wove a tight little piece of legislative fabric. He made sure every agency ever involved in managing disease and preparing for natural disaster had a piece of the pie?and a very smelly pie it is. We?ve created a new and vulnerable underclass, with fewer civil protections than any since slavery. This sort of stuff attracts the real sharks, Mitch. The monsters.?
?All they have are hatred and fear.?
?In this town, that?s a full house,? Gianelli said. ?Washington eats truth and shits spin.? He stood. ?We can?t challenge Emergency Action. Not this session. They?re stronger than ever. Maybe next year.?
Mitch watched Gianelli pace a circuit of the room. ?I can?t wait that long. Riverside, Dick.?
Gianelli folded his hands. He would not meet Mitch?s eyes.
?The mob torched one of Augustine?s goddamned camps,? Mitch said. ?They burned the children in their barracks. They poured gasoline around the pilings and lit them up. The guards just stood back and watched. Two hundred kids roasted to death. Kids just like my daughter.?
Gianelli put on a mask of public sympathy, but underneath it, Mitch could see the real pain.
?There haven?t even been arrests,? he added.
?You can?t arrest a city, Mitch. Even the New York Times calls them virus children now. Everyone?s scared.?
?There hasn?t been a case of Shiver in ten years. It was a fluke, Dick. An excuse for some people to trample on everything this country has ever stood for.?
Gianelli squinted at Mitch but did not challenge this appraisal. ?There isn?t much more the congressman can do,? he said.
?I don?t believe that.?
Gianelli reached into his desk drawer and took out a bottle of Tums. ?Everyone around here has fire in the belly. I have heartburn.?
?Give me something to take home, Dick. Please. We need hope,? Mitch said.
?Show me your hands, Mitch.?
Mitch held up his hands. The calluses had faded, but they were still there. Gianelli held his own hands beside Mitch?s. They were smooth and pink. ?Want to really learn how to suck eggs, from an old hound dog? I?ve spent ten years with Wickham. He?s the smartest hound there is, but he?s up against a bad lot. The Republicans are the country?s pit bulls, Mitch. Barking in the night, all night, every night, right or wrong, and savaging their enemies without mercy. They claim to represent plain folks, but they represent those who vote, when they vote at all, on pocketbooks and fear and gut instinct. They control the House and the Senate, they stacked the court the last three terms, their man is in the White House, and bless them, they speak with one voice, Mitch. The president is dug in. But you know what the congressman thinks? He thinks the president doesn?t want Emergency Action to be his legacy. Eventually, maybe we can do something with that.? Gianelli?s voice dropped very low, as if he were about to blaspheme in the temple. ?But not now. The Democrats can?t even hold a bake sale without arguing. We?re weak and getting weaker.?
He held out his hand. ?The congressman will be back any minute. Mitch, you look like you haven?t slept in weeks.?
Mitch shrugged. ?I lie awake listening for trucks. I hate being so far from Kaye and Stella.?
?How far??
Mitch looked up from under his solid line of eyebrow and shook his head.
?Right,? Gianelli said. ?Sorry.?


End chapter.

Note the comment about the New York Times. The despairing comment about Democrats. Note Emergency Action, and compare with Homeland Security--which did not exist when I wrote DARWIN'S RADIO. Nor had 9-11 happened. Thereafter, the parallels with my novels are pretty remarkable.

Which led me in part to write QUANTICO, from the perspective of professional law enforcement--conservatives--and try to figure out where we'll be in ten years, given current trends. QUANTICO predicts we'll have a conservative administration for at least one more term after Bush.

But enough said.

Good question about Shevite porn. No doubt they'd all have to wear veils...and dark eye glasses! But how do you stop those scent glands?

What's the situation like where you are? You guys have been handed one of the toughest jobs in modern American history, and whatever the news stories are, we're all interested in personal observations and experience.


Response: Hello from first-timer
Posted By: Cpt John H. Smith III, Baghdad, Iraq - 06/10/2006 09:31:35 AM

(sending again - accidentally sent without my info attached)

Mr. Bear,

I'm not able to respond to all of your points, but I will say this. When you talk about spokespeople on the right, particularly with Ann Coulter, you are preaching to the choir here. I prefer the less entertaining but more insightful Bill Buckley or George Will. But you are really blind if you think the right are the only ones doing it, and nobody is "firing back". For every "thug" like Ann Coulter or Rush Limbaugh, I can show you a equally "thuggish" Michael Moore, Paul Krugman, Bill Maher, Al Sharpton, or Markos Moulitsas ("Daily Kos"). It seems pretty bizarre to claim the left doesn't have at least an equal voice when they control Hollywood, most of the print media, and all the major news networks, except for Fox!

Heck, here's an example I just came across a few minutes ago, from a review of "Road to Guantanamo". This is pretty typical of thuggish hate speech from the left that I so often see on the web, from people who believe in every single outrageous accusation they hear against the US military:

"This film illustrates in crystal clear detail why the U.S. military needs to recruit very dumb, totally uneducated, and mostly southern cracker soldiers who are already racist bastards who have never left their hometowns and believe all the garbage they are taught in school about how we are the good guys, and everything we do is just and right. The Army can then brainwash them to treat other human beings in such a grotesque and inhuman manner."
http://www.thehollywoodliberal.com/road_to_guantanamo_movie_review.htm

The passage from "Darwin's Children" that you quoted completely smears Republicans but all it says about Democrats is that they are weak and disorganized (basically their status at the time the book was published). You don't see a difference there? And your mention of the NYT is actually a hidden admiration; it says: "Even the New York Times calls them virus children now" - implying that normally the NYT doesn't submit to such irrationality.

My question about Shevite porn was actually what would porn look like, if it were tailored toward Shevite viewers instead of humans? Shevites would certainly quickly become a substantial population, and like the rest of the business world, porno dealers would try to tap that market and give them what they want. I'm sure that whole new lines of beauty products, deodorants, specialty foods, sitcoms, and all sorts of new things would also be created for the new market.

Finally, to answer how is our situation - It would take me a lot more space that I can use here. This is my second tour; In 2003, I was with the 1st Armored Division and came to Baghdad right after the initial invasion. We were extended here longer than the normal one year. Now I am with a completely different unit, assigned to a team embedded with an Iraqi police battalion, but coincidentally, I am back in the same area of Baghdad as before. By the time my tour is up here, I guess I can confidentally boast that few, if any, military members know more about Western Baghdad than I do.

When people ask how things are here, strangely they are often disappointed when I tell them, it isn't that bad. OAt least not for us. For the average Iraqi, life here is very hard. During the day, I'm on the road a lot, in the miserable dust and heat, but at least I have a clean place to go back to at night, power is almost always on, airconditioning (a godsend out here), good food (even a Burger King nearby), the best medical care should I need it, and mail is reliable. (Its a far cry better than when I first got here; medical care was first rate right off the bat, but nothing else was. I ate MREs for two months straight and slept on the roof of a building at night because it was too hot inside. It seemed like a great luxury when my wife mailed me a mosquito net).

But Iraqis just don't have most of these things. Unlike me, they can't escape the city for awhile. Power only runs sporadically, and so many badly needed doctors left the country, before and after Saddam. There is no mail system at all. And corruption is such a normal part of the culture here, that the govt runs at only half the efficiency it should.

Its especially hard for children here, and that is what bothers me the most. Few American children have seen dead bodies or hear gunshots every day, or need to be carefully escorted to school. I've seriously considered adopting some Iraqi children to take them away from this, but in the self-destructing culture of too many Islamic countries, I can't do this. It is usually illegal for a Christian to adopt Muslim children, and even where not expressly illegal (like in Iraq for now) it drives the Islamic fundamentalists nuts. Many of them would rather see Muslim children dead than adopted by an "infidel", or a woman dead, rather than married to one.

Speaking of children, another problem which I never see mentioned, is the crisis this country is going to have about 12-15 years from now. It seems counterintuitive, but the country is headed for a population explosion that it just isn't equipped to handle. Iraqi families since the first Gulf War have had a LOT of children. Children are everywhere. The average age in this country is about half that of the USA. Right now there is a huge housing shortage - but when this generation of kids grows up, it will be much, much worse, and you will have a huge disaffected population, the kind that so often turns to crime or terrorism.

Of course, we get attacked sometimes, but we have so much protection now these attacks rarely succeed, and in fact in our area, most insurgents have mostly given up on attacking Americans and only go after softer targets like our Iraqi police, or conduct revenge killings on Shias or Sunnis.

A lot of progress has been made, but the media don't talk about that much. But this country was practically in the Stone Age when we arrived in 2003. Iraq was not nearly as strong as most of the world thought. It will take a long time to build it up, and we need help from more international organizations. The US military isn't ideally equipped for building up infrastructure and society. But the problem is, Al Quaida suicide bombed the UN and IRC buildings in Baghdad back in 2003, and they and other groups have kidnapped relief workers, scaring everybody off. That is their strategy, they just want the US to fail, so they can set up an Islamic state, and they don't care how many innocent Iraqis die for this goal.

Response: Hello from first-timer
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/12/2006 11:21:18 AM

Thanks for the info, John.

I don't really listen to any of those folks on either side who spend their times bloviating and dissing. I do like Molly Ivins, however, but wonder what would happen if we transplanted her brain into Ann Coulter's body...

Or perhaps we could have Michelle Malkin and Ann Coulter mud-wrestle with Michael Moore and Al Franken?

Facts are what I need--there's already too much uninformed opinion out there. But I tend to believe the media is not so much biased as overworked, underfunded, and, in some cases, just plain dumb. Of course, those I think are dumb may differ from those you think are dumb.

That's why it's essential to skim the channels and pick up different papers and journals. A few gems always shine out in the dust.

The statement by a congressional staffer in DARWIN'S CHILDREN is almost word-for-word a quote from the lips of a Dem staffer in DC in 1999, and was meant to reflect the emotions of a partisan conflict during deeply troubled times. I took similar but somewhat opposite quotes and emotions from FBI agents I listened to at the Academy and used them in QUANTICO--my characters speak their minds, whatever their orientation. (Interestingly, QUANTICO is being issued from American Compass, a conservative book club. If my grand plan reaches fruition, I will now piss off all my liberal readers--and my demise will be complete!)

My own opinions are not nearly so simple--I'm well aware that if Iraq gets back on its feet, George Bush will be seen in a couple of decades as a political visionary. I certainly hope that happens. What chaps my ass is the lack of good planning and preparedness from the start--a reflection of civilian leadership with no experience of war. I was deeply conflicted about the invasion of Iraq largely because I believed the civilian leadership wasn't telling us the truth--I never did believe the WMD tale, Colin Powell's testimony was suspicious in the extreme--and that they would be woefully inadequate for the job--and I was shown to be correct.

The military has performed admirably, given the limitations of leadership and difficulty of the mission.

Fascinating insight about Iraq's future population explosion. Sounds like a breeding ground for more disaffection! In QUANTICO, I have an officer in country complaining about the U.S. withdrawing too soon from Iraq, leaving it to shift in the wind. The Sunnis are in control again, and there have been years of civil war. We are nominally allied with the Sunnis against a nuclear Iran. I certainly hope all these predictions are proven wrong. (I also predict our next president after Bush will be a Republican. Sigh.)

Glad to hear our troops are being well taken care of. Saw BAGHDAD ER recently--devastating, heartbreaking. But the professionalism and sympathy of the doctors and staff in the CSH units is awesome in the true sense of the word.

BEAUTIFUL
Posted By: Naellah Whitehead, Yukon, Oklahoma, USA - 06/03/2006 01:04:28 AM

mr. bear,
i recently read your novels darwin's radio, and darwin's children. i was very impressed with your writing. i read alot(emphasis) of science fiction and theology. those are my favorite forms of entertainment. you seem to have tapped ideas that i have always ascribed to: that evolution somehow follows god's plan for the world. these were wonderously beautiful novels. i can't describe how much pleasure they brought to me, having just gave birth six weeks ago to a little boy. you showed alot of insight into the way an intelligent woman would feel about pregnancy. i can't help wondering whether you had help with that part? ;) i will definitely be tuning in for your other novels and future writing. i don't have any questions, just wanted to show my appreciation for your skills and let you know that your writing is being enjoyed immensely.
thanks
naellah
(and lincoln-link when he's older will definitely read this, as his name was chosen partially for the feelings/ideas expressed in this book)

Response: Beautiful
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/03/2006 02:03:53 PM

Thank you, Naellah! I had help by example writing about Kaye's pregnancy, of course--watching our own family grow. "God's plan" touches on a lot of hot-button issues today. The best way I can express it, is that I think of the laws and constants discovered by science as God's fingers. Not evidence of divinity--but divinity itself. Does evolution always benefit the individual? Of course not. But we wouldn't be here without it--to experience life and do science and wonder about the mysteries we have yet to solve.

Response: Beautiful
Posted By: patrick - 06/05/2006 04:10:27 PM

I'm glad you're emphasizing a sort of reason to those who feel some of your writing affirms their religious beliefs. This is an important 'endeavor' for those in (relatively) high profile places such as yourself.

Response: Beautiful
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/05/2006 05:16:10 PM

It's a difficult balance--reason can't solve problems when the evidence is insufficient, and that's what's happening here, and in nearly all spiritual phenomenon. The dialog between reason and faith is dangerous but crucial--but sometimes, reason has to admit its inadequacies.

If we put this in terms of a superior alien race with incomprehensible technologies--indistinguishable from magic!-- and inscrutable psychology, somehow that makes the conflict more palatable for us rational types. And that was the case in the film version of CONTACT--as well as 2001: a Space Odyssey. But even that metaphor could still be all wrong!

ZERO-POINT ENERGY, DNA, AND WATER
Posted By: patrick - 06/01/2006 03:54:09 PM

The last post reminded me of an article I encountered at Dan Simmons' forum, the article content possibly further upping the ante in genetics, if not pushing the need to redefine chemisty:


(from New Scientist magazine)

"IN NEW AGE circles, everyone is talking about it: the magical properties of the colourless, tasteless liquid the rest of us blithely refer to as water. Between frequent gulps of the life-giving elixir, those initiated into its secrets talk reverently of the work of Masaru Emoto, who is said to have proved that water responds to the emotions of those around it."

http://forum.dansimmons.com/ubbthreads/showthreaded.php?Cat=0&Number=7698&page=1&vc=1

Response: zero-point energy, DNA, and water
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/01/2006 09:45:42 PM

Pushing the envelope here! The sopping wet envelope...

RNA-MEDIATED NON-MENDELIAN INHERITANCE
Posted By: Matthew Lewis Carroll Smith, Memphis - 05/30/2006 06:33:44 PM

"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy." --Hamlet (I, v, 166-167)

I thought you'd find this interesting:

In a startling exception to classical genetics, mice in a lab experiment have inherited an effect of an aberrant gene without inheriting the gene itself.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060525/ap_on_sc/gene_free_traits_5

Response: RNA-mediated non-mendelian inheritance
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/30/2006 06:43:57 PM

Thanks, Matthew! This is indeed a fine and puzzling result. It may very well be some version of RNA inheritance--but other possibilities may include a "backup" copy being reassembled from so-called non-coding portions of DNA, or from other apparently unrelated genes. These are my own suppositions. Whichever, it's a fascinating question: How many genes can be reassembled using this process? How many genes can be overridden or canceled? Can more than one genetic pathway produce the same phenotypical result? If so, Mendelian inheritance and much of evolutionary theory is in need of revision.

MORE (AND MORE IMPRESSIVE) NANO GEAR
Posted By: patrick - 05/26/2006 10:16:16 PM

this is just a summary; i don't have a subscription to Science. still, though......


How About an Invisibility Cloak?

In as few as 18 months, the military may have access to an invisibility cloak that makes the wearer appear invisible. The cloak will be made of "metamaterial," which is made using nanotechnology and can change the direction of electromagnetic radiation.

Because light waves flow around the metamaterial, any object inside of it becomes invisible, similar to water flowing around a smooth rock. Researchers have compared it to opening a hole in space. Along with the obvious stealth military operations such a cloak could be used for, the material could also be used to conceal factories and other eyesores from the countryside.

Nanotechnology is also behind many other exciting inventions, like the world's strongest bulletproof vest and natural bandages. As nanotechnology progresses, it is sure to change our lives ? and health care as we know it.

Science May 26, 2006

Response: more (and more impressive) nano gear
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/27/2006 03:45:47 PM

Sounds like we should not license off-planet export, lest Predator buy the technology! (But I have to say this sounds right properly overhyped--"Flow around the metamaterial"? Hm.)

Response: ah, i forget hyperlinks aren't functional here....
Posted By: patrick - 05/27/2006 04:28:06 PM

http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/312/5777/1120a

Response: more (and more impressive) nano gear
Posted By: Howard E. Miller, Augusta, Georgia - 05/30/2006 01:18:41 AM

The part about making light flow around the metamaterial doesn't sound nearly as remarkable as having it jump off at just the right place.

ALMOST UNIVERSAL
Posted By: Mike Trent, Dallas, TX. - 05/25/2006 10:02:49 PM

I have read 17 of your books in the past months. Thank you so much!

The book I just finished was 'Darwin's Chidren'. Excellent! However, I find you contradict yourself and my experience. You say at one point in the book that half the people in the world have some kind on epiphany, then you say in your Caveats section that the experience is 'almost universal'. Half does not make 'almost universal'.

When talking to Christian friends, the kind that would open up to me, NONE of them had such an experience. 11% of Americans do not believe in any kind of higher power. These facts demonstrate that your statement 'almost universal' is incorrect.

Saying that this experience is as indescribable as 'love' is in error. With the exception of a few sociopaths we all feel something we call love (though what we attribute this feeling may differ). I suspect only a few people have felt the thing you call epiphany.

It is certainly within the power of the human brain to create this feeling. We know people delude themselves. I am not saying I know that you are deluding yourself, but I certainly know that is possible, and believe it to be likely.

With respect,

Mike

Response: Almost universal
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/26/2006 11:36:01 AM

So--Mike, you've never experienced this? "Almost universal" is perhaps an exaggeration for the kind of experience I've had--but for variations of such experiences, half is about right. Could it be delusion? Absolutely. All internal psychological states are, in this sense, self-induced "delusion." The big question is not whether this is real, or delusion, but whether it is caused by an external force--or whether even that question makes any sense. And there are atheists who have experienced something like an epiphany, but then considered it a delusion, and ignored it. I found it difficult to ignore. Kaye Lang, you'll notice, makes no hypotheses about what happened to her--perhaps wisely.

Response: Almost universal
Posted By: Barbara Branham, Portland, Oregon - 06/02/2006 07:17:55 PM

I just finished "Darwin's Children" and was surprised at the statement about the near universality of the experience of an "epiphany." I suppose it depends on whether that experience is associated only with the sense of a higher being being present.

I had an unusual experience over a decade ago which I can describe no other way but as an epiphany. I was in grad school working on an MFA in painting and drawing. I was having trouble understanding how to think about the process of painting and after much struggle and anguish, one day, suddenly,in a flash, everything became clear -- at least for that issue. The experience went light years beyond the usual "Aha!" moment in the creative process. I felt such elation and a strange physical lightness...as if I was floating. This lasted for a couple of days and my husband thought that I had definitely gone round the bend I was so giddy. The feeling faded after a few days, never to return. Anybody who knows me would say that I'm probably the last person they would expect to have such an illogical experience. Maybe it was simply some psychological state that an expert on brain chemistry could explain.


Response: Almost universal
Posted By: Greg Bear - 06/04/2006 07:08:23 PM

Thanks, Barbara! Samuel R. Delany mentioned a similar feeling to me during a dinner discussion back in 2001, and I'm sure this is a common enough experience as well--certainly among artists! Is it related to these other epiphanic moments? Muse or God? I don't know. Any thoughts, readers? (I've had artistic moments similar to this--but they haven't lasted for days...)

DARWIN'S RADIO SCIENCE LITTERATURE REFERENCES.
Posted By: Davide Gaudesi, Cornaredo, Milano, Italy - 05/24/2006 04:13:20 PM

Hi Mr. Bear,
newly your biologist italian fun need contact you.
I really appreciate your effort in order to give humanity to human scientists community. I am reading, like I said last time, Darwin's Radio. I gain the point in which Kaye and Mitch go to live in Indians territory.
Now I want to subscribe my request: searching trough PubMed I found these two interesting review, only from abstract because at the moment I don't have time to read them:
Bannert N, Kurth R. Retroelements and the human genome: new perspectives on an old relation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Oct 5;101 Suppl 2:14572-9
Sverdlov ED. Retroviruses and primate evolution. Bioessays. 2000 Feb;22(2):161-71. Review.
In your site I am not able to found litterature citation or link, so if you will be so kind to show me others work about this topic, I will be very happy.
Waiting for an answer accept my best regard.

--

Dr. Davide Gaudesi

gaudesidavide@tiscali.it

Response: Darwin's radio science litterature references.
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/24/2006 05:44:30 PM

Davide--

You must not have my reading list in the Italian edition, and you're correct, it's not on my web site--an oversight! Here it is, taken from the U.S. edition of DARWIN'S CHILDREN, and by no means exhaustive. The literature has expanded enormously in the last few years.

A Brief Reading List:

A concise, elegantly written and conservative view of neo-Darwinian evolutionary theory is available in Richard Dawkins?s River out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life, BasicBooks, 1995. Dawkins is one of our best science writers and an excellent whetstone for anyone wishing to challenge institutionalized views of biology and evolution. It is my belief that he is wrong on many points, but he defines the debate in ways few others can.
Published more recently, and going into more detail, Ernst Mayr?s summing up of a life?s work, What Evolution Is (2002, Perseus Books) makes another clear and unyielding statement of the paradigm of modern Darwinism. There will probably be no finer exponents of the old view of Darwinian evolution.
The new view is emerging even as we speak.
Stephen Jay Gould is unfortunately no longer with us. I recommend all of his learned and impassioned books and essays, but in particular the flawed, and for that reason no less fascinating and instructive, Wonderful Life (Norton, 1989).
A good bridge to a larger understanding of the turmoil in evolutionary theory is Niles Eldredge?s Reinventing Darwin: The Great Debate at the High Table of Evolutionary Theory, Wiley, 1995. Eldredge and Gould are currently credited with a particular view of evolutionary leaps known as punctuated equilibrium, but the idea goes back at least to masters such as Ernst Mayr, and even back to Darwin. Wherever it comes from, punctuated equilibrium was one of the key stimuli to my writing Darwin?s Radio. Gould and Eldredge should not be blamed for my elaborations, however.
Peter J. Bowler?s The Non-Darwinian Revolution: Reinterpreting a Historical Myth (1988, Johns Hopkins) is scholarly and entertaining at once.
A fine introduction to genetics is Dealing with Genes: The Language of Heredity by Paul Berg and Maxine Singer, 1992, University Science Books. Though a decade old, its information is still useful and its attitude is forward-looking. It could prepare the reader for the following books.
Lynn Margulis and Dorion Sagan have published an excellent critique of neo-Darwinianism in Acquiring Genomes: A Theory on the Origins of Species, 2002, BasicBooks. Margulis is a pioneer in thinking about cooperative and symbiotic systems, and she and her son Dorion make up the single most stimulating popular writing team in modern biology.
More radical still, but just as polite and level-headed as Margulis, is Lynn Caporale, whose Darwin in the Genome: Molecular Strategies in Biological Evolution (2003, McGraw-Hill) is a clear and thoughtful examination of how genomics will shape and mutate the debate on evolution.
Lamarck?s Signature: How Retrogenes are Changing Darwin?s Natural Selection Paradigm, by Edward J. Steele, Robyn A. Lindley, and Robert V. Blanden (1998, Perseus Books) focuses on one possible cause and arbiter of genomic variation.
A key text in modern biology is Retroviruses, edited by John M. Coffin, Stephen H. Hughes, and Harold E. Varmus, 1997, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. Mostly for professionals, this rigorous and pioneering collection of monographs is filled with useful information.
Of particular relevance to my two novels is Lateral DNA Transfer by Frederic Bushman, 2002, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, is an important synopsis of what is currently known about DNA transfer through viruses, transposons, plasmids, etc. I think it is one of the most significant biology books published in the last decade.
James V. Kohl?s The Scent of Eros (1995; reprinted in a revised edition, 2002, Continuum) is a rich source of information on pheromones, human communication through smell, and the influence of scent on sexuality.
There?s a wealth of fine writing on these topics in many other popular science books, textbooks, and magazines. Searching on author names and topics in online bookstores can be a good way to leapfrog through diverse subjects. Which leads us to a very small sampling of Web sites.
Searching on key words in Web engines such as Google (?HERV,? ?Retrotransposon,? ?Barbara McClintock,? ?Homo erectus,? ?Mitochondria,? etc.) can lead the curious reader into a combination paradise and mine field of articles peer-reviewed and otherwise, research goals and updates, opinions, and quite a few rants of varying degrees of erudition. Caveats abound?there are dozens if not hundreds of Creationist and other religiously-motivated, anti-evolution sites that seem to discuss evolution and genetics with some lucidity, for a while. Generally speaking, the science here is dubious at best.
Nevertheless, searching on Google is how I located excellent articles by Luis P. Villarreal. In particular, I was influenced by Villarreal?s ?The Viruses That Make Us: A Role For Endogenous Retrovirus In The Evolution Of Placental Species,? available on the Web at

http://darwin.bio.uci.edu/~faculty/villarreal/new1/erv-placental.html

(Dr. Villarreal, Eric Larsson, and Howard Temin should not, however, be blamed for all the uses their ideas are put to in this novel.)
James V. Kohl?s Web site, www.pheromones.com, provides a number of links to articles and other sites that discuss the biology of smell. The Web site of the Molecular Sciences Institute, www.molsci.org, is filled with interesting news and developments. The International Paleopsychology Project, www.paleopsych.org, is a clearing house of fascinating ideas with many links to other Web sites.
Periodically, I will post bibliographical updates on www.gregbear.com, as well as comments from readers about the theoretical underpinnings of the Darwin novels.

Acknowledgments:

Special thanks to Mark Minie, Ph.D., and Rose James, Ph.D.; Deirdre V. Lovecky, Ph.D.; Dr. Joseph Miller; Dominic Esposito of the National Cancer Institute; Dr. Elizabeth Kutter; Cleone Hawkinson; Alison Stenger, Ph.D.; David and Diane Clark; Howard Bloom and the International Paleopsychology Project; Cynthia Robbins-Roth, Ph.D., James V. Kohl, Oliver Morton, Karen Anderson, Lynn Caporale, and Roger Brent, Ph.D.


QUANTICO - INTENTIONAL OR ACCIDENTAL MISNAMING?
Posted By: Paula Beckman, Ames, IA - 05/24/2006 09:42:08 AM

Greetings, Greg. I just finished reading "Quantico" (gotten thru SFBC) and I really enjoyed it. But I have a question that's been driving me crazy: you mention the "University of Ames, Iowa." I am praying that you were taking liberties and that is how Iowa State University, located in Ames, Iowa, is known in the future in which your book is set. We have 3 "major" universities: Iowa State University (Ames); University of Iowa (Iowa City); and University of Northern Iowa (Cedar Falls). We have enough trouble here in Iowa with "others" knowing next to nothing about our state. I am hoping that you are not one of "them." I look forward to your response. And will keep my fingers crossed that you write more in the "Quantico" vein, continuing with those characters, even. Thanks in advance for your reply!

Response: Quantico - intentional or accidental misnaming?
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/24/2006 10:26:49 AM

Looks as if this might be small slip in one of my sources, but I don't have the book at hand to check. There are many mentions on Google of (Iowa State) University OF Ames, sometimes reduced to "University of Ames, Iowa," and even more of Iowa State University AT Ames. I presume the more common usage would be the latter.

Response: Quantico - intentional or accidental misnaming?
Posted By: Paula, Iowa State University - 05/24/2006 11:12:45 AM

Ames is not a part of the name of the university. It is "just" the location. Googling "University of Ames, Iowa" or even "University of Ames" (without using the quotes) will give you the link to the ISU homepage as the first or second in the list. We are Iowa State University of Science and Technology.

I'm sure I'm coming across as nit-picky, but as a native Iowan, an alumna of ISU, and now an employee of ISU, I hope you will understand.

And I just want to say again that "Quantico" was a great book!!!

P.S. If you ever need a researcher located in the middle of the US, feel free to e-mail! LOL

Response: Quantico - intentional or accidental misnaming?
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/24/2006 11:28:19 AM

Thanks, Paula! My last defense here is that the reference is in dialog--so, obviously, Rebecca Rose got it wrong! (But I'll try to correct her in subsequent editions.) Glad you liked QUANTICO.

Response: Quantico - intentional or accidental misnaming?
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/24/2006 11:45:59 AM

Let me make a request here--because of QUANTICO's difficult history, there may be additional errors, both typos and factual. No thorough professional proofreading has been done in the United States, nor was I able to go through my usual vetting process with multiple experts--other than informal interviews at Fort Detrick, NCI-Frederick, and other locations--due in part to the current state of U.S. politics. Any corrections (and please, do your own double-checking!) are welcome.

DEAD LINES
Posted By: will, tokyo - 05/23/2006 11:49:24 PM

it is i suppose a natural thing that readers evolve as much as writers. and in my case almost all of the SF authors i adored in high school (mid 80's) no longer seem as shiny.

except for yourself (and maybe vernor vinge who i wish would write more).

my first intro to your work was with blood music, and i have managed to read and enjoy most everything else you have written since then. it is impressive that you are able to keep producing increasingly sophisticated stories without losing the freshness of your early work. dead lines was for me a bit trippy at the end, but the book is def a new favorite. thanks for that.

no comments or questions, just a thanks...

actually i lie...any chance of a sequel to moving mars?




Response: dead lines
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/24/2006 10:16:16 AM

Thanks, will! No sequels for MOVING MARS are in the works. And I too wish Vernor would write more, but he has a new book out from Tor as we speak, RAINBOW'S END. Highly recommended.

DARWIN'S CHILDREN PROCREATION
Posted By: ryan costa, memphis, tn - 05/23/2006 12:09:51 PM

Hi,

I was thinking of the biological changes wrought in Darwin's Children. Since we've been bipeds for so long, it would make sense for evolution to favor Vaginas opening in front of Pelvic bones, rather than between them. It is a leap, but even whales ended up with noses behind their skulls sometime. It would also be nice to not have toe nails, and some way of opening cans with our bare hands. Further down the road I guess.

Response: darwin's children procreation
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/23/2006 12:19:06 PM

In order to place your evolutionary change order, you must fill out the proper forms. Please refer to form ERV-1069. Submissions must be in hand before the next product announcement. Unfortunately, due to excessive demand, we are unable for the time being to process requests that do not have to do with improving/replacing the human backbone.

--The Management

(thanks, ryan!)

THOUGHTS ON "SONGS OF EARTH AND POWER"
Posted By: Howard E. Miller, Augusta, GA - 05/21/2006 01:38:56 AM

I've finished reading "Songs Of Earth And Power" once again. I originally read "The Infinity Concerto" and "The Serpent Mage" before I discovered the two novels combined. I've been wondering if you started "The Infinity Concerto" and during the writing of it, realized that there was another novel to be written? Certainly by the time Michael meets Tonn's wife on the Blasted Plain, the further story is set, since Tonn's wife mentions Kristine. At this first meeting Michael doesn't know who Kristine is, yet Tonn's wife already knows where Kristine is, despite the fact that Kristine's kidnapping hasn't happened yet.

In mulling this over the phrase "The time is out of joint" occurred to me and I wondered if Michael could be an analog to Hamlet. Nah. Despite the aptness of the phrase, "Songs Of Earth And Power" isn't a revenge tale. Michael regrets every death that occurs due to his actions. Although one might be able to argue that Eleuth is Ophelia to Michael's Hamlet, certainly there is no nunnery in Michael's journey. Besides, Michael isn't forced into the circumstances he finds himself in. He gets there by his own decision and actions, while Hamlet's situation arises because of the actions of others.

The role that Michael has thrust upon him is more of a breaker of impasse among the Sidhe. He arrives in the Realm at the cusp of its dissolution and his subsequent actions actually result in the saving of countless Sidhe, not to mention a few thousand humans. And Epons.

When you write a novel, how much preparation do you do beforehand? Do you make notes, construct timelines and outlines? Or are you more like Poe in the practice of your craft? This is the part of the novel that us readers rarely get to see.

By the way, I think there are signs that the Crane Women have taken up residence right here in Augusta, Georgia. Each day I take Crane's Ferry road to get to work, and Crane Creek flows right behind the apartment where I live.

Response: Thoughts On "Songs Of Earth And Power"
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/21/2006 01:21:44 PM

Thanks, Howard! Parts of THE INFINITY CONCERTO go back to high school--in terms of ideas--and a first draft was completed in 1971, when I was in college. A re-thinking in the early eighties led to the present version, which was indeed planned as two novels. The one volume edition in the U.S. incorporates revisions made in the nineties, but the UK edition--despite calling itself revised--somehow managed to miss those minor, mostly cosmetic changes. I don't usually do an extensive outline, but I do make notes as I go along. The older I get, I suspect, the more notes I'll be making, rather than relying on memory! Now, Howard, you have to be pulling my leg about those streets. Are there any streets in Georgia NOT called Peachtree?

Response: Thoughts On "Songs Of Earth And Power"
Posted By: Howard E. Miller, Augusta, GA - 05/23/2006 09:54:49 AM

You must be thinking of Atlanta. They have a lot of that 'Peachtree this and Peachtree that'. You have to understand that the only reason that Atlanta is part of Georgia only because it's located here.

Response: Thoughts On "Songs Of Earth And Power"
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/23/2006 10:14:46 AM

Got you! I'll be in Atlanta to speak at Emory this September. Would love to get outside the city and see more of Georgia, but doubt there will be time, unfortunately.

CAMP/BASE/WHATEVER
Posted By: patrick - 05/17/2006 03:32:52 PM

that's at least the third or fourth person to mention it. i don't recall if i did, but i know that wasn't the only thing i said - christ. in any case, great irony about the hardback, and the afterlife part raises some curiosity, despite its intended humour.

Response: camp/base/whatever
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/17/2006 03:40:17 PM

I do appreciate the corrections--early or late, somebody's bound to help me proofread a book.

DEAD LINES
Posted By: Michael Tinsley, Birmingham, AL - 05/16/2006 07:39:24 PM

You wrote about being at an Army 'camp' when there is no such _thing. The US Army has bases and forts....the Marines have camps.

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/17/2006 10:02:39 AM

Ah, Michael, how nice that you're reading the hardback edition! The paperback corrects this little gaffe. Though, watching BAND OF BROTHERS recently, I noted Army troops receiving training during WW2 at a Marine Base. Any examples of this during the Vietnam period, readers? (Nobody so far has tried to correct my extreme inaccuracies about the afterlife...)

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: David Clark, Vista, California - 05/18/2006 08:01:49 PM

Sorry Michael, but there are or were indeed Army Camps. Camp Roberts and Camp Hunter Leggett in the California central coast come to mind, as well as Camp Van Dorn in Mississippi. I was stationed at Hunter Leggett in the '70s and Camp Roberts was sill being used by the National Guard or Army Reserves into the '80s at least.

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/19/2006 09:58:43 AM

Okay, I take it back, folks--everybody should buy and read the hardback edition of DEAD LINES, since it may have been right after all! Although, David, I can't find any reference to Hunter Leggett as a camp--it's a fort in all the refs I can locate. Next step--did any Army types train at Camp Lejeune? (Hunter Liggett himself "took command of the 41st Division at Camp Fremont (Calif.) and deployed with the unit to France", according to a BYU library bio.)

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/19/2006 10:00:29 AM

Oops--should be Hunter LIGGETT throughout.

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Alan Kellogg, San Diego CA - 05/22/2006 09:50:39 PM

Greg,

Are you sure the hero succeeded? And what do you see as the effects on the world if the dead could continue to butt in on occasion.

"Yo, fleshie. We told you time and time again to stop using your trans at three in the morning. It happens again we'll start leading the ghost of roadkill to your house."

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/23/2006 10:12:46 AM

Absolutely, Alan. What if we let those ghosts start posting on Myspace.com? Download ghostly music clips and ectoplasmic erotica? Could get nasty! And to paraphrase Michael Crichton, "Death will find a way"...

Response: Famous Camps
Posted By: Howard E. Miller, Augusta, GA - 05/23/2006 11:14:23 PM

I'm not an expert on things Army, but I do know that the Army has camps too. There is a place in northeast Georgia that was used for parachute training during World War II. It was called "Camp Toccoa". Camp Toccoa is a place where some of those 'devils in baggy pants' received their first jump training.

It's my understanding that a 'camp' is a place that is specifically devoted to training of one kind or another. On the other hand, a 'fort' is a place that contains administrative functions, such as headquarters and such. Both Fort Benning, Georgia and Fort Bragg, North Carolina are examples, although training also occurs there.

Another quite famous camp is Camp Swampy, which I believe is still active today.

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Alan Kellogg, San Diego CA - 05/25/2006 08:18:18 AM

Greg,

Exorcist is going to be a very popular career. :)

Response: Dead Lines
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/25/2006 10:51:26 AM

Have to carry your own jamming equipment...

THE CHILDREN
Posted By: Tom Julian, Hamilton Square NJ - 05/16/2006 10:55:25 AM

Greg,

Just finished Darwin's Children and I'll be wrapped up in that world for a while. One thing I am dying to really understand, but could never get my imagination around, was what the children's facial features actually looked like. Several times their "Sheva Facial Features" are referred to. Have their been any good artist's renditions of the children?

Thanks,

Tom

Response: The Children
Posted By: Greg Bear - 05/16/2006 11:46:10 AM

Hello, Tom! No portraits as of yet. I've described Stella as looking a bit like the singer Brandy, with cheek freckles that move and gold-dappled irises. Skin color tends to be more uniform in Shevites. The major differences are in their communications skills--most would pass physically as "exotics."


Posted By: Ryan , Broomfield, CO - 05/13/2006 11:37:01 AM

Mr. Bear,

I am currently reading your story e